A couple of weeks ago, Professor Emeritus Richard Lindzen and 300+ other scientists and professionals sent a Petition to President Trump asking the President to withdraw the United States from the United Nations Convention on Climate Change. 22 academics, calling themselves “MIT Faculty Working on Climate” published an opposing letter, parroting climate alarmism dogma. Continue reading MIT Climate Faculty Letter Signatures Confirmed
I did a little research and published some technical papers in the wind power. This experience has opened my eyes on the real nature of climate alarmism.
Initially, I didn’t know how far the alarmist claims were from real science. But I saw that the “renewable energy” push by the second Obama administration was just a make-believe effort. Continue reading Climate Alarmism Used “Renewable Energy” as a Decoy
In preparation of its texts, IPCC utilizes General Circulation Models (GCMs), analyzed using computers. Such models, and the way in which IPCC utilizes them, exhibit — among others — the following errors.
There is no mathematical apparatus (i.e., proven theorems) behind these models and “ensembles”. This fact makes the whole modeling exercise useless. This fact also makes rigorous evaluation or criticism of these models very difficult or even impossible to do. The following notes apply to the GCM models (including their more complex variations, such as AOGCM). Continue reading Mathematical Errors in IPCC Climate Models
The General Circulation Models (GCM), alleged by IPCC to forecast climate, are computationally intensive computer programs that repetitively perform the same task: integrating specific sets of differential equations, such as the primitive equations of weather. In such situations, a normal practice is developing specialized hardware for performing that task. One example is video encoding hardware, evolved from big boxes, that make grainy and jumpy 640×480 moving pictures, to the tiny circuits inside of the CPUs of modern cell phone, producing smooth 1920×1080 full motion video. Continue reading Climate Models – the Strange Case of Missing Hardware
Knowledge is power, especially in this Era of Political Repression. A useful database of IPCC and climate alarmism is published by Peter Bobroff, ex Royal Australian Navy Commander. The website describes itself:
This is the place for basic research. There are no articles or stories here. You can look up an individual person, country, organisation, email etc. There are also much broader comparison tables from many view points. Continue reading Climate Alarmism Research Database
IPCC has been deceiving public on carbon cycle from 1990 First Assessment Report. The article contains only one technical passage in need Continue reading New Essay about IPCC Carbon Cycle Fraud on WUWT
The worldwide CO2 emissions in the last 10-15 years have been underestimated by 8-15% because of the data fabrication, caused by the IPCC process. See Notes on FAO-FRA 2010. The implication is that all physical models of the carbon cycle that agree with the official data are wrong. That is, one more time wrong.
Continue reading Carbon Cycle Research Update
Call it “historical responsibility” or “historical merit”, but the fact is: 66% of the surplus CO2 in the air has been released by non-Western countries.
The re-estimate is based on the admission of underreporting emissions by China and scattered indications of higher than expected underreporting of deforestation by the developing countries. See original Atmospheric CO2 Change front page.