“The daily Vedomosti reported Thursday that Google has reached an agreement with the Russian state media oversight agency, Roskomnadzor, to regularly receive updated lists of banned sites and delete links to them upon review. The newspaper says Google has already removed about 70 percent of the banned websites from its search results.
The RIA Novosti news agency quoted Roskomnadzor as saying it has established a ‘constructive dialogue’ with Google.”
Feb 18, 2019
Apparently, the real foreign interference in the 2016 elections was committed by Eurocrats, British “remainers“, the government and secret services of Angela Merkel, and their collaborators. The Democratic Party and Hillary/Obama loyalists in the security agencies have been colluding with them since April 2016.
“Trump’s candidacy was not particularly welcomed by the U.S. political establishment. Governing bodies in Britain and the European Union were also worried. The European Union was feeling pressure from Merkel’s “Open Borders” policy and ongoing monetary policy dissension … Britain was contending with the Brexit Movement … The EU viewed Candidate-Trump’s rhetoric with growing alarm. European Intelligence Agencies noticed as well.“
“DNI James Clapper, confirmed EU involvement during Congressional testimony:
Feinstein: Over the spring of 2016, multiple European allies passed on additional information to the United States about contacts between the Trump campaign and Russians. Is this accurate?
Clapper: Yes, it is, and it’s also quite sensitive. The specifics are quite sensitive.”
“CIA Director John Brennan was the conduit for intelligence flows from Europe [according to BBC]:
Last April , the CIA director was shown intelligence that worried him. It was – allegedly – a tape recording of a conversation about money from the Kremlin going into the US presidential campaign.
It was passed to the US by an intelligence agency of one of the Baltic States.
Sometime in the early summer, Robert Hannigan, Britain’s intelligence head of Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) traveled to Washington D.C. to meet with Brennan regarding alleged communications between the Trump Campaign and Moscow [quotes The Guardian]:
That summer, GCHQ’s then head, Robert Hannigan, flew to the US to personally brief CIA chief John Brennan. The matter was deemed so important that it was handled at “director level”, face-to-face between the two agency chiefs.
Hannigan’s U.S. counterpart wasn’t CIA Director Brennan – it was NSA Director Mike Rogers.”
Apparently, Hannigan knew that Mike Rogers was honest, but Brennan was a potential traitor, so he went to Brennan. Brennan didn’t disappoint him. Hannigan abruptly resigned three days after Trump’s inauguration.
“Brennan used information gained from Hannigan – and other European sources – to start a multi-faceted investigation. Brennan used the GCHQ information and other tip-offs to launch a major inter-agency investigation. The taskforce included six agencies or departments of government. The FBI, Treasury, and DOJ handled the domestic inquiry. The CIA, Office of the Director of National Intelligence and the National Security Agency handled foreign and intelligence aspects.
Brennan’s inter-agency task force is not to be confused with the July 2016 FBI Counterintelligence Investigation – which formed later at Brennan’s urging.”
“CIA Director John Brennan used information from our European counterparts to force FBI Director Comey into starting a formal Trump-Russia Investigation.”
The whole article is worth reading.
Feb 15, 2019
“Just a week after Breitbart News exclusively published internal discussions showing YouTube routinely intervenes in its search results to promote establishment news sources (including in searches for “abortion”), the Google-owned video platform is doubling down on search censorship.
YouTube announced Friday that it will intervene in recommended videos — the content that is recommended to viewers of a video on the right-hand sidebar. Previously a mix of content tailored to users’ viewing history, YouTube says it will now intervene to remove “content that could misinform users in harmful ways” from recommendations.”
Feb 8, 2019
“Today, one angry email from a left-wing journalist is enough to get a tech giant to frantically manipulate its algorithms — or even create manual blacklists — to appease them. The journalists at BuzzFeed have become masters of this tactic.”
Feb 5, 2019 (the date of publication on this site)