Big Tech Platforms are NOT Speakers, Editors, or Owners of their users’ Speech and Relationships.
Motion for Leave to Intervene in NetChoice v. Paxton 5th Circuit of Appeals #21-51178.PDF
Affidavit in NetChoice v. Paxton 5th Circuit of Appeals #21-51178.PDF.
Also, Big Tech Platforms are state actors.
November 8, 2022, update:
For voting related searches (such as ‘poll place‘) Google places at the top of the search results links the same Democrats-supporting group – Democracy Works. VIP is its project. The result is NOT marked as an ad.
As a state actor, Google is not allowed to do that.
On March 16, 2020, Didier Raoult, one of the world’s leading experts on infectious diseases and the director of the medical institute Méditerranée Infection (Marseille, France), reported at a scientific conference that a combination of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin rapidly cleans viral loads in patients with COVID-19. On the same day, the Institute published the presentation on its YouTube channel and embedded the video in its website. Over the night of March 28–29, Google’s YouTube removed this presentation! YouTube showed the message, “Video unavailable. This video contains content from Canal Plus, who has blocked it on copyright grounds.”
Continue reading Big Tech censorship under color of DMCA 512(g) is illegal
2022-11-04: Added sources: Reuters and Statista, 2014. Minor corrections.
2020-03-01: wireless data costs ($90B) are added to fixed broadband costs ($50B), yielding $140B, redistributed by Obamanet in favor of Big Tech annually, starting in 2015, and likely growing.
Supporters of Big Tech impunity pulled a quick one on us. They say that as conservatives and libertarians, we are against government interference with private businesses, so we should leave Big Tech alone. This argument is disingenuous. As conservatives and libertarians, we tend to be against laws, regulations, and government policies that interfere with private businesses. But the existing laws, regulations, and policies that restrain, constrain, endanger, and otherwise interfere with private businesses must be enforced on Big Tech just as they are enforced on other businesses. If government tells a small bakery owner that he cannot select customers, the government must tell the same to Google, Facebook, and Twitter, just billions of times stronger. Continue reading How Obamanet Created “Masters of the Universe”
The J6 defendants’ right for trial outside of the DC is grounded in the First Amendment. The First Amendment preserves the right of citizens “to petition the Government for a redress of grievances”. That includes traveling in person from their home states to the DC, the current Seat of the Government. Subjecting citizens exercising this right to a trial by a jury consisting of the officials of the Government, their associates, contractors, clients, relatives etc. obviously violates this right.
Yet, this is what is done to the J6 defendants, almost all of whom are not residents of the DC, an arrived to the DC with the only purpose: “peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances”. Presumption of innocence protects them against accusation that hey did not assemble peaceably.
Thus, trials of J6 defendants must be moved out of the DC. Continue reading DC Courts v. Fair Trial for J6P
Democrats call the events of January 6, 2021, an “insurrection.” One would expect that the Democrat DOJ would move quickly against real or imaginary “insurrectionists” and would be done with this business quickly. Nothing prevented them. Mr. Biden appointed 1,136 government officials on his first half-day in the office, not bothering with the Senate’s “Advice and Consent.”
The graph of weekly number of new J6 cases, opened by the DOJ in DC. The highest number – 70 cases – was on the week ending on January 23, 2021. Continue reading J6 Repression Statistics
Senator Mark Warner (D) has been pressuring Big Tech to censor Republicans since 2018, at least. After the Demsurrection of January 6, 2021, Senator Warner also pressured Big Tech, mainly Facebook, to retain personal and private communication of its users, related to the J6 events. Facebook complied, and provided troves of its users’ private data to DC prosecutors to cherry pick from.
Recent discovery of emails, in which the Biden-Harris administration tells Facebook what speech to censor on its platform, has caused a scandal. Both BHA and Big Tech are going to deny the coercion. But such coercion was in plain view since 2018. Democrat legislators, Attorneys General, and other government officials have coerced Big Tech to censor opponents of Democrat agendas, by threats of adverse legislation and/or regulation.
The full report (2,450 words): Mark-Warner-Coercing-BigTech-since-2018.pdf Continue reading How Senator Mark Warner Coerced Big Tech
Attorneys for J6 defendants raised the issue that their defendants cannot receive fair trials in the DC, due to the partisan preferences of the DC jury pool. 92% of DC voters voted for Biden, and only 5.4% voted for Trump. The DOJ objected. For example, in USA vs Strand (UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 1:21-cr-00085-CRC), prosecution cited[1] a DC Circuit of Appeals decision from 1975 as saying that the DC jurors pool was ok for a fair trial for Nixon associates, despite overwhelming majority of DC votes cast for Democrats. The DC presidential votes in In the DC Presidential elections of 1968 and 1972, Democrats (D) received 81.8% and 78.1% of the DC vote, respectively.[2]
The prosecution argument is wrong. Current DC bias in favor of Democrats, measured by the voting results, is incomparable with what existed in that time, circa 1974.
While 82% and 92% may seem like close numbers, the rate of D:R supporters is drastically different. Circa 1974, that rate was 4:1; now it is 19:1. Today, a DC jury is likely (53%) to have 12 Democrats and no Republicans. Continue reading DC Jury v. Fair Trial
2022-09-15: American Thinker published my article Who was Behind the January 6 Events?
2022-06-10: American Thinker published my article When SCOTUS Sided with Big Tech.
The January 6 damage to the Capitol building is estimated at $1.5 Million! This is a tiny amount for such a big and delicate building. This proves that there was almost no attempt to defend Congress. The USCP, overseen by Nancy Pelosi and commanded by Democrat favorites, allowed tourists, protesters, and attackers into the building. Then it used their presence as a pretext to interrupt the Senate and House sessions, which were hearing objections to the Arizona slate.
On January 6, inside the Capitol: “Again, any of the violent actors, and most certainly the dumbstruck tourists, could have been stopped in their tracks had officers produced their weapons. As it happened, before my own eyes, police did not draw their weapons until reports of “shots fired” were received over their radios. (In actuality, the ONE shot fired at Ashli Babbitt.)” – TPC-2 (The Practical Constitutionalist) Continue reading J6 Drafts
Karlin Younger said the timer was on 20 minutes when she found the bomb near the RNC building. This is impossible. There was only the timer dial, which was a solid piece with a knob, and a small mechanism behind it. The time is indicated by a red arrow on the timer’s body, which was removed. Without it, she could see only the knob pointing to 0 and 30. Thus, Karlin Younger lied. The following photos are of a similar kitchen timer, which until recently was sold by Walmart.
Washington DC, January 6, 2021. The actor Jacob Chansley, playing his QAnon Shaman persona, appears on a raised platform. His torso is exposed to the wind and cold. Fifteen to thirty minutes later, he is inside the warm Capitol building. How did Jacob Chansley know he would manage to get inside?
Jacob Chansley, also known as Jake Angeli, climbed the platform wearing thick gloves (see second photo). It is smart when climbing a metal construction in cold, but how did he know ahead of time that he would do that?
After leaving the platform, he went to a locked and closed door of the Capitol while carrying a spear with a carelessly attached flag, a megaphone, an electronic device, and a small backpack (see video). In a few minutes, somebody opened the door from inside and let him and the crowd behind him to enter the Capitol building. How did Chansley know that this would happen and the precise time? Without prior knowledge, he might have expected to remain outside for hours before being arrested. At his spot, he would also have been deprived of his audience.
There is only one answer to these questions. Chansley acted under the control of persons who knew ahead of time that the Capitol would be breached. Only those who caused the breach could have known this. Only Democrats were interested in the Capitol breach on Jan 6. Only Democrat operatives could have arranged it. So Chansley must have been hired by Democrat operatives to do what he did on January 6.
Chansley was not a Trump supporter. Continue reading Jacob Chansley on Jan 6 and False Flag Operations in the Era of Big Tech
A duly elected, certified, and sworn in President of the United States appoints senior government officers “by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate”, per Article II Section 2 of the Constitution.
A usurper, who came to power in a putsch, would want to fortify his grip on power as quickly as possible and without the consent of anybody, other than his clique.
Senescent Biden appointed 1,136 government officials on January 20, 2021: Continue reading Differences between Inauguration and Usurpation
From the Oath Keepers Declaration:
We will NOT obey any order to force American citizens into any form of detention camps under any pretext.
We will NOT obey any order to blockade American cities, thus turning them into giant concentration camps.
We will NOT obey any orders which infringe on the right of the people to free speech, to peaceably assemble, and to petition their government for a redress of grievances.
Who and why fears people declaring this? Continue reading Who is Afraid of the Oath Keepers?
The following is a copy of The Hidden Danger of Omicron Vaccines, first published by the TrialSiteNews on 08/31/2022. It needs an amplification: the FDA has authorized the novel bivalent (Wuhan + Omicron BA.5) vaccine booster WITHOUT CLINICAL TRIALS. Nevertheless, this out of the focus of this article.
We are facing another man-made catastrophic threat related to COVID-19. It is the vaccines against Omicron variant.
Today, the FDA has authorized bivalent booster shots, targeting Omicron and the wild type virus, from Moderna and BioNTech-Pfizer.1 UK conditionally authorized this vaccine a few weeks ago. Continue reading The Hidden Danger of Omicron Vaccines (TSN)