Big Tech are State Actors

2021-05-18 update: Biden revoked Trump’s executive order, intended to minimize government protections to the online censorship by Big Tech. Now Big Tech are officially state actors for the purpose of the First Amendment.

Once again: Big Tech are state actors. They became state actors when FCC Net Neutrality regulations (Obamanet) forced Internet users to pay for delivery of Big Tech content and traffic, without giving anyone a choice. Continue reading Big Tech are State Actors

Anti-Spike Vaccines

Abstract

The politicization and censorship of any negative information or research about the COVID-19 vaccines justifies a review by a lay person. The official narrative is quite far from the reality.

Excluding China, the top vaccines for COVID-19 only target the spike protein of the coronavirus SARS-COV-2. They work by injecting into the human body RNA or DNA, coding for the coronavirus spike protein, slightly modified. This leads to the development of antibodies and memory cell immunity, targeting this protein. Unfortunately,

  1. Immune response to the spike protein represents only a small part of the natural immune response to the coronavirus.
  2. The spike protein is responsible for most of the damage caused by the coronavirus (at least when a cytokine storm does not happen).
  3. The vaccines create too much spike protein, probably to compensate for the lack of other antigens.
  4. The spike protein is the most frequently mutating part of the coronavirus. Some coronavirus strains make vaccination less efficient. Strains escaping vaccine-induced immunity will probably appear within months, if not weeks.

The strains with immunity evading spikes are likely to spread within the vaccinated populations, with unpredictable consequences. Continue reading Anti-Spike Vaccines

Vaccinating Healthy Young People – Risk without Benefit

2021-05-10 update: FDA has purportedly authorized Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine for emergency use on children 12 – 15 (the letter & press release). This reckless authorizations is signed by the same Denise Hinton, who wrote crooked restrictions into the EUA for HCQ, and then withdrew that EUA. Giving children 12-15 this vaccine would be a crime, regardless of consent of the victim. end of the update

It is very painful to watch young people (original meaning was ages 18-30) forced and/or tricked into getting COVID-19 vaccines they do not need, just because it is the policy. Those under the age of 45, without well-known preexisting conditions (obesity, diabetes, hypertension, & few more), are almost at zero risk of dying from COVID-19, and they have a very low chance of experiencing any serious form of the disease. For these young people, the short-term symptoms of a COVID-19 vaccine are more serious than what they would experience from the disease itself. Besides, most of these young people already have at least some immunity from natural exposure to the Wuhan coronavirus. One can develop immunity to COVID-19 without experiencing any symptoms. Continue reading Vaccinating Healthy Young People – Risk without Benefit

Healthcare Communication Relay

This is an unsolicited backup of an article by Doctors for COVID Ethics, published on April 30, 2021, and removed by its host Medium a few days later.

COVID Vaccines: Necessity, Efficacy and Safety
Abstract

COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers have been exempted from legal liability for vaccine-induced harm. It is therefore in the interests of all those authorising, enforcing and administering COVID-19 vaccinations to understand the evidence regarding the risks and benefits of these vaccines, since liability for harm will fall on them. Continue reading Healthcare Communication Relay

COVID-19 No-Treatment Panel

2021-05-05 update is related to Ivermectin, but goes beyond it. Since the Panel purports to speak on behalf of the National Institutes of Health, even when it expresses a neutral stance toward a medication has a negative meaning.

“We must remind the Panel that in the absence of even a weak recommendation, the vast majority of the nation’s health care providers will be unwilling to prescribe ivermectin despite it being far safer than medicines such as aspirin or acetaminophen.” – from FLCCC Alliance Response to the N.I.H. Guideline Committee Recommendation on Ivermectin use in COVID-19, February 11, 2021. Continue reading COVID-19 No-Treatment Panel

Suggestions to India on COVID-19

COVID-19 is a preventable and easily treatable disease. However, we currently find ourselves in this bizarre situation, where the Western medical establishment became confused about COVID-19 treatment and prevention. The powers that be (including W.H.O., CDC, FDA, NIH COVID-19 Treatment Panel, and the European EMA) aggressively protect their senseless orthodoxy of not preventing or treating COVID-19. It is unclear what came first – the unprecedented establishment of this intolerant monopoly on the medical opinion or adopting absurd views as its orthodoxy. Regardless, all these organizations now share the same opinion, and hold to it without listening to the voices of practicing physicians, new research, and failure of their theories. The key element in this phenomenon is probably consumer-facing Big Tech (mainly Google[1] [2], Facebook, Twitter, and Microsoft), but this is off-topic here. Many medical journals fell to corruption and political pressures and published junk science undermining effective and inexpensive COVID-19 treatment[3] [4]. Continue reading Suggestions to India on COVID-19

Hodgkinson and FB group Terminate the Republican Party

2021-04-25 update: Facebook deleted the group “COVID19 VACCINE VICTIMS AND FAMILIES,” having more than 120,000 members. Notably, Democrat Senators and Democrat state Attorneys General pushed Facebook to do that. Thus, Facebook has shown itself to be a state actor. end of the update

2021-04-22 update: The FBI classified this attempt at mass murder and overthrow of the government as a suicide by cop, although there were no cops there. The shooter’s intent to murder multiple Republican Senators and Representatives was obvious. The shooting happened when McCabe was acting FBI Director. end of the update

The Left-Wing Terrorist’s Capitol Hill Coup d’Etat, Spectator, June 2017

The article shows that James T. Hodgkinson’s attempt to murder multiple Republican members of Congress during a baseball practice could have flipped the House to Democrats in 2017, and make Senate split 50:50. Not spelled in the article, but even the 52:48 ratio felt as the Democrat majority because of multiple RINO’s and Flakes. Continue reading Hodgkinson and FB group Terminate the Republican Party

Big Tech vs Trump – the Beginning

Foreign influences on Big Tech explain its sudden anti-Trump derangement, starting at the beginning of Trump’s term.

Most of Big Tech have international headquarters in Ireland to avoid taxation. This is how they keep their effective corporate tax rate below 15%, on average, while simultaneously advocating for increased taxation of the middle and upper-middle classes. Thus, Ireland effectively regulates Big Tech, on behalf of the European Union.

Ireland was and still is extremely opposed to England leaving the EU (Brexit). The Obama administration also opposed Brexit. Thus, Trump was probably perceived by the Irish government as an adversary. Due to Ireland’s enormous influence on Big Tech, it is hard to believe that it did not pressure Big Tech to take an anti-Trump stance. Continue reading Big Tech vs Trump – the Beginning

From the Web 2021

There is an excellent thread by “Dr. Simon” on $TWTR. He explains the connection between the suppression of science and the irrational attitude to COVID-19. He also shows similarities between the use of COVID-19 by Democrat-Socialist / Big Tech / Fake News and techniques of control, used by totalitarian regimes against prisoners. In my opinion, these techniques are also used by the so-called social media. It begins:

“1/77 #Science and neutral reporting are increasingly being oppressed. This is only possible as we find ourselves in a continuous state of #fear. In this eye-opening thread, I’ll explain how this could have happened and what #consequences this development has on our lives.

Continue reading From the Web 2021

Published in 2021

Executive Order Canceling the Constitution is published in the American Thinker. This is about the Executive Order on Blocking Property with Respect to Specified Harmful Foreign Activities of the Government of the Russian Federation. Contrary to its title, this EO purports to allow the Biden regime to deprive Americans of our rights and property by arbitrarily linking us to real or imagined of the Russian government.

If it were not enough, children (adult, so far) are also punished.

Stock of Alt-Energy Quadrupled during the Pandemic. What’s Up? was published in WUWT today, February 19, 2020.

Big Tech and IT Security was published in the American Thinker on December 16, 2020.

Evidence of Pelosi Putsch

2021-04-19 update. DC Chief Medical Examiner Francisco J. Diaz has just told to WaPo that officer Brian D. Sicknick had no physical injuries, but suffered two strokes and died of natural causes (“acute brainstem and cerebellar infarcts due to acute basilar artery thrombosis“). Notice that the results of autopsy did not exist on March 2, a month after officer’s body was cremated, according to the official version. They said they were awaiting toxicological results.

Curiously, Francisco J. Diaz was appointed Acting Chief Medical Examiner by radical Mayor Muriel Bowser only on January 28, 2021. He was a Deputy CME before that. His LinkedIn profile was scrubbed recently, so it remains in the search results, but is not available on LinkedIn, even for the members.

Shows Diaz LinkedIn profile in the search results Continue reading Evidence of Pelosi Putsch

Legal Precedents for Big Tech

Primrose v. Western Union Telegraph Co., 154 US 1 – Supreme Court 1894

“in accordance with an opinion of Judge Hare, the most important parts of which were as follows: ‘A railway, telegraph, or other company, charged with a duty which concerns the public interest, cannot screen themselves from liability for negligence; but they may prescribe rules calculated to insure safety; and diminish the loss in the event of accident, and declare that, if these are not observed, the injured party shall be considered as in default, and precluded by the doctrine of contributory negligence. The rule must, however, be such as that reason, which is said to be the life of the law, can approve; or, at the least, such as it need not condemn. By no device can a body corporate avoid liability for fraud, for wilful wrong, or for the gross negligence …’

This precedent fully applies to Google (Search & YoutTube), Facebook, and Twitter.  Microsoft software EULA seems to take into account this ruling – Microsoft accepts liability in some cases and limits it to the price of the software. Google, Facebook, Twitter etc. refuse to accept any liability, so they cannot limit it.

Living Document

Google still Misinforms Us about COVID-19 Treatment

2021-04-13 update. Google has a special factcheck tool, which it uses to misinform the public, decision makers, and journalists on all kinds of topics, including the use of  Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin against COVID-19.

India has been successfully using HCQ for treatment and prophylaxis of COVID-19 almost from the beginning. This is why it has so low COVID-19 mortality (124 deaths per Million, 14x lower than the US, despite much higher population density in India). But Google found an obscure website there, which correctly states that W.H.O. did not approve HCQ for COVID-19, then it proceeds to deny its effectiveness. Google flatly denies effectiveness of HCQ and IVM against COVID-19, even admitting that their effectiveness was asserted by doctors. This article is the first result in Google’s “Fact Check Explorer”. Continue reading Google still Misinforms Us about COVID-19 Treatment

Google and Twitter services are not First Amendment speech 

Twitter recently filed an arrogant lawsuit against Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, claiming to be a publisher making editorial decisions, as if Twitter’s 70 million US users submitted to Twitter’s policy on all topics discussed on twitter. Before this lawsuit, Twitter had called itself a communication utility or channel. This article does not discuss the legal fallacies and factual errors in the complaint. However, one thing that caught my attention is that Twitter cited the influential case Zhang v. Baidu (Federal District Court for SDNY, 2014), in which the court ruled in favor of Baidu. This decision brings us to a stealthy PR campaign, which Google ran in 2011-2014.  Continue reading Google and Twitter services are not First Amendment speech 

Antifa Tactics at the Capitol on January 6

Former US Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund testified about “the rioters”:

“These people came specifically with equipment. You’re bringing climbing gear to a demonstration, explosives, chemical spray – you’re coming prepared … The fact that the group attacked our West Front 20 minutes before the event at the Ellipse ended …”

This is at least an hour before Trump fans, listening to the end of his speech, could have arrived. MPD acting chief Robert Contee said “the rioters” used hand signals, radio communication, and chemicals; placed two pipe bombs; and acted in coordination. This is consistent with the tactics of some Antifa groups and other long standing seditious leftist organizations. Read Unmasked by Andy Ngo.

The DC prosecution (including the FBI, the Capitol police, and the Metropolitan Police Department) blame the Oath Keepers and Proud Boys without adequate evidence, and look away from the Dem allies.

DC intimidates witnesses of Jan 6 events

There were only fourteen arrests made inside the Capitol building, on January 6. In the following days, DC authorities started an unprecedented witch-hunt, threatening to arrest hundreds of people. Not only individuals inside of the Capitol building, but people standing outside on the Capitol steps and even on the lawn, have been accused of committing crime (Yahoo News). The unhinged acting DC federal prosecutor, Michael Sherwin, announced that possible charges against members of the public would range from unlawful entry to conspiracy and sedition. Unnecessary to say, that over the last years Democrats encouraged rioting in and around the Capitol building, and their rioters got away with slaps on the wrist. Continue reading DC intimidates witnesses of Jan 6 events