“Doctor Google” vs IVM and Licensed Physicians

October 29: added a YouTube screenshot, falsely and harmfully claiming that the FDA is a ‘national health authority‘ (the bottom of the article).

July 24 was celebrated by COVID-19 treating physicians, scientists, and their supporters as Ivermectin Day. For Google, it was another “no cure for COVID-19” day. It returned results denying effectiveness of Ivermectin for COVID-19 treatment.

Google markets its search for medical information as a medical advice (simultaneously denying that) on the most frequently searched topics, which include COVID-19. It claims to offer information on symptoms, treatment, prevention, and safety, which is refined by its doctors (rather than received from third parties).

As an additional fee for its medical advice, Google also stores and uses the customer’s (patient’s?) medical searches information. Of course, it also shows ads.

Continue reading “Doctor Google” vs IVM and Licensed Physicians

Big Tech vs Medicine

This article was first published in TrialSiteNews behind a paywall.

The root cause of many of the disastrous responses to this pandemic is the global echo-chamber created and sustained by Big Tech. Big Tech companies (Google, Facebook, Twitter, Microsoft, Apple – in that order) systematically endorse false information and harmful governmental decisions, reject effective treatments, and collude among themselves to eliminate any dissenting views.

For example, no matter how many doctors and even politicians become convinced that Ivermectin is effective against COVID-19, Big Tech maintains its anti-Ivermectin position. The narrative that “Ivermectin as a treatment against COVID-19 is disinformation” is ingrained in the brains of Big Tech’s low- and middle rank censors, encoded in its databases and AI, and even in its business relationships. It is highly unlikely that any of Big Tech’s high-level executives would step in to change this narrative. Initiating such a change would almost an admission of guilt, acknowledging that their company imperiled millions of people who would have greatly benefited from the treatment.

Big Tech is much more powerful than Big Pharma. Big Tech is also accustomed to impunity, unlike Big Pharma. During this pandemic, Big Tech has added to its valuation >$3 Trillion (yes, with T), much more than Big Pharma can dream of. Continue reading Big Tech vs Medicine

Google Spies on .gov Sites

Shockingly most US government and military websites contain Google Analytics, which sends information about every visitor, on every page, back to Google. Google combines this data with the information it has on that visitor, collected on other websites and in other Google products, and uses it across its products. By itself, the data sent by these websites to Google might be of little value, but Google identifies the visitor via his/her IP address and/or cookies, and adds this data to the user’s ever-growing profile. All of this is done without the knowledge or permission of the user.

Google and its subsidiary YouTube use this information for many purposes, the most benign of which is ad targeting. For example, one might target audiences who were interested in the information on a certain government website. Some Google insiders have direct access to this information.

Theoretically, Google employees can correlate visits to the FBI Tips website with other web activities by the same person, and to aid the persons of interest. Also theoretically, Google can use data from visits to courts’ websites to forecast litigation against it and its partners.

These are  grave violations of our Constitutional rights, especially under the Fourth Amendment. This is also another way in which Google assumes the role of a state actor, which is still subject to all Constitutional restrictions on  government powers. Continue reading Google Spies on .gov Sites

Build Back Better

What does Build Back Better mean? Something should be destroyed to build it back. Where have I heard it? The Communist International, in Russian, second verse:

Весь Мир насилья мы разрушим
До основанья, а затем
Мы наш, мы новый Мир построим;
Кто был ничем, тот станет всем.
We will destroy this whole violent World
To the ground, and then
We will Build Back Better;
Those who were nothing will become everything.

Well, more accurate translation of the third line is We will build our new World, but the meaning is the same. Notice that they need to destroy the whole World, no less.

Merck Ignores Molnupiravir Cytotoxicity

My article Merck Ignores Molnupiravir’s Cytotoxicity is published in Trial Site News behind paywall. This is a free copy Molnupiravir-Cytotoxic-Merck.PDF.

The fraudulent and malicious marketing of Molnupiravir by Merck explains its campaign against Ivermectin. Its anti-Ivermectin statements should be considered part of its Molnupiravir marketing, and Merck should be held accountable. Continue reading Merck Ignores Molnupiravir Cytotoxicity

Is Molnupiravir a Global Catastrophic Threat?

This article was first published by TrialSiteNews behind a paywall.

Merck’s Molnupiravir (also known as EIDD-2801 and MK-4482) is a mutagenic nucleotide analogue [1]. It introduces errors in the SARS-COV-2 RNA at the time of replication after proofreading, and causes lethal mutagenesis [2]. This threatens to accelerate the evolution of the coronavirus.

Any major variant of the coronavirus represents local optimum (in mutations space), maximizing coronavirus’ fitness. One- or two-point mutations cannot accomplish this. A new variant can only rise through the change of the virus-host-conditions systems, or through larger mutations set. Even a moderate increase in the point mutations frequency causes a big increase in the frequency of multi-point mutations and dangerous recombinations. Such events are too rare to be caught in small trials, but inevitable in large populations, and might lead to catastrophic consequences. The authorization and broad use of Molnupiravir is likely to breed very dangerous SARS-COV-2 variants. Continue reading Is Molnupiravir a Global Catastrophic Threat?

Live Unattenuated/Attenuated Virus Vaccines for COVID-19

2021-10-04, preprint, self-published Cochrane-style

Live Unattenuated/Attenuated Virus Vaccines for COVID-19

Leo Goldstein

Introduction

Among the many vaccine technologies attempted for COVID-19 vaccines, the oldest technology – live unattenuated virus (LUV) vaccine – has hardly been mentioned. For the purposes of this article, a LUV vaccine refers to the process of administering a small amount of unattenuated virus in conjunction with the anti-viral against it [1]. Continue reading Live Unattenuated/Attenuated Virus Vaccines for COVID-19