2021-06-05: New paper Symptomatic Acute Myocarditis in Seven Adolescents
Following Pfizer-BioNTech COVID- 19 Vaccination is published in Pediatrics.
“This report summarizes case histories of 7 healthy male adolescents 14
to 19 years of age who developed acute myocarditis or myopericarditis within 4 days after receiving the second dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, none of whom met criteria for MIS-C.”
Continue reading More Evidence against COVID-19 Vaccination of Kids
Explanations and references for The Forced COVID-19 Vaccination of Children: A Crime in Progress, published in the American Thinker on May 28. The victims are denied information that the anti-spike vaccine lacks benefits for children and adolescents, but is likely to cause antibody-developed enhancement (worsening) of COVID-19 when the victims encounter it in the fall or winter 2021-2022. Other long term effects have never been studied.
Only a small fraction of children and adolescents below age 18 has got severe form of COVID-19, and almost all of them had chronic conditions putting them at risk. Per Characteristics and Disease Severity of US Children and Adolescents Diagnosed With COVID-19 [a1], at least 84% of people below 19, hospitalized with severe COVID-19, had chronic conditions. The total number was 756 (March – October 2020), out of almost two million children and adults of the same age, hospitalized or seen in ER in that period. Continue reading ADE, OAS, MISC-C etc.
Modern Antifa roots are not in the Weimar Republic Antifaschisitsche Aktion (1919-1933), but in the violent leftist & terrorist organizations of West Germany, in the 1960-70s. The Weimar Republic anti-fascists were destroyed twice, first by Hitler and then by Stalin. Continue reading AntiFA
2021-05-18 update: Biden revoked Trump’s executive order, intended to minimize government protections to the online censorship by Big Tech. Now Big Tech are officially state actors for the purpose of the First Amendment.
Once again: Big Tech are state actors. They became state actors when FCC Net Neutrality regulations (Obamanet) forced Internet users to pay for delivery of Big Tech content and traffic, without giving anyone a choice. Continue reading Big Tech are State Actors by Obamanet
The politicization and censorship of any negative information or research about the COVID-19 vaccines justifies a review by a lay person. The official narrative is quite far from the reality.
Excluding China, the top vaccines for COVID-19 only target the spike protein of the coronavirus SARS-COV-2. They work by injecting into the human body RNA or DNA, coding for the coronavirus spike protein, slightly modified. This leads to the development of antibodies and memory cell immunity, targeting this protein. Unfortunately, Continue reading Anti-Spike Vaccines
2021-06-15 update: Medical researchers agree that there is no reason to vaccinate kids against COVID-19, but they are frightened to go against the faux consensus, and have to word their opinion cautiously.
Vaccinating children against SARS-CoV-2. Hard to justify right now for most children in most countries.
Young people have been largely spared from severe covid-19 so far, and the value of childhood vaccination against respiratory viruses in general remains an open question for three reasons: the limited benefits of protection in age groups that experience only mild disease; the limited effects on transmission because of the range of antigenic types and waning vaccine induced immunity; and the possibility of unintended consequences related to differences in vaccine induced and infection induced immunity.
Lavine J S, Bjornstad O, Antia R. Vaccinating children against SARS-CoV-2. BMJ, May 13 2021 Continue reading Vaccinating Healthy Young People – Risk without Benefit
This is an unsolicited backup of an article by Doctors for COVID Ethics, published on April 30, 2021, and removed by its host Medium a few days later. This reproduction does not imply endorsement.
Doctors for Covid Ethics [links to their new website]
2021-05-05 update is related to Ivermectin, but goes beyond it. Since the Panel purports to speak on behalf of the National Institutes of Health, even when it expresses a neutral stance toward a medication has a negative meaning.
“We must remind the Panel that in the absence of even a weak recommendation, the vast majority of the nation’s health care providers will be unwilling to prescribe ivermectin despite it being far safer than medicines such as aspirin or acetaminophen.” – from FLCCC Alliance Response to the N.I.H. Guideline Committee Recommendation on Ivermectin use in COVID-19, February 11, 2021. Continue reading COVID-19 No-Treatment Panel